Sunday, August 24, 2008

Immigration Study: 'Second Generation' Has Edge

by Margot Adler


Weekend Edition Sunday, August 24, 2008 · In much of the debate over immigration, there is an underlying question: Are today's immigrants assimilating into the mainstream as easily as past generations?

The answer, at least in New York City, is an unqualified "yes," according to the results of a 10-year study involving more than 3,000 young men and women, most of them in their 20s.

John Mollenkopf, a professor at City University of New York and an author of the study, says that if you look at the children of immigrants, "the kids are doing well compared to their parents and also doing well compared to the native-born comparison groups."

The "second generation" project looked at five groups — Russians, Dominicans, South Americans, Chinese and West Indians — and compared them with U.S.-born whites, Puerto Ricans and African-Americans. Researchers found that most in the second generation were fluent in English and working in the mainstream economy. When they looked at economic and educational achievement, they found that West Indians were doing better, in general, than African-Americans; Dominicans were doing better than Puerto Ricans; and the Chinese and the Russians were doing as well as or better than native-born whites.

Because this is New York City and most study participants are the children of people who came to the United States 20 to 30 years ago, their parents either entered legally or found it relatively easy to obtain legal status even if they came illegally.

Legal immigration is more difficult today, and researchers note that this may well change the rate of assimilation. But for these five groups, "what we really find is a very rapid assimilation and becoming American," says Mary Waters of Harvard University, another author of the study, titled Inheriting the City: The Children of Immigrants Come of Age, and recently published as a book.

Inheriting the City also uncovered cultural differences that may give the children of some immigrant groups certain advantages. Many members of this second generation interviewed for this story said their parents had pushed them to succeed academically. This is a common theme in immigrant families, even a stereotype.

Enia Titova, who came from Russia when she was 12, attended Stuyvesant, an elite New York public high school. "In a lot of Russian families, if you don't have a graduate degree, it is frowned upon," she says. "When you get a 96, parents want to know where the other four points went — that's the question, I think, in a lot of immigrant households."

But the researchers also found something unexpected: Some groups, such as Chinese immigrants, knew how to work the system more effectively than others.

"We interviewed one young woman whose mother worked in a garment factory and had very little education," Waters says. "She said her mother didn't even know what Stuyvesant was, but she knew from the other moms in the garment factory — I need to get my kid into this school."

Ling Wu Kong, who came from China when he was 2 and now attends law school, says Waters is correct. "Every time there is a student who maxes out on the SAT, their picture is prominently placed on the front page in the Chinese newspapers," he says. "They give you a pretty good idea of what to expect, so even for people whose parents don't speak English, they are able to navigate the system."

It's a little different for other groups.

Waters says researchers also met Dominican kids who had gotten into Stuyvesant, but whose parents didn't let them go to the school because they would have to take a subway and go across bad neighborhoods to get there.

Cristina Carpio's parents came from Ecuador. Now a medical student, Carpio says she went to Stuyvesant only after persuading her mother to let her go. "During the orientation week, my sister took me to Stuyvesant to ease my mother's fears," she says, adding that her sister told her mother, "Look, she knows how to take the subway, she knows how to do it on her own, she has to go to that school. There is no other way."

The study, funded by the Russell Sage Foundation, found that the children of immigrants in New York City had another big advantage: Many of them continue to live at home with their parents.

Carpio says that when she becomes an intern next year, "I will be moving back home because I can save money on the rent and pay for my loans." And Ling feels it wouldn't be right if he didn't go home. "There is this ideal in the Chinese community, when everyone lives together. I'm living at home now," he says, laughing.

That cultural difference can have huge economic consequences, says Philip Kasinitz, a professor of sociology at City University who also helped write the study. "Black Americans, white Americans and Puerto Ricans seem to share the idea that you must leave home in your teens or early 20s, and that there is something wrong with you if you are still living with your parents in your mid-20s," he says.

In New York, he notes, given real estate values, this can help the children of immigrants get their careers established and finish their education.

Although Inheriting the City paints an optimistic portrait of this second generation, it has some warnings about the situation facing native-born minorities. The researchers also say the children of undocumented immigrants tend to do worse and have a tougher time assimilating. Because legal immigration is tougher to come by today, researchers say they wonder whether the path for the next "second generation" will be as smooth.

Just an interesting addition to our past immigration debate and the debate overall. There seems to be a perspective that "new" immigrants are not assimilating as successfully as the European immigrants of the last century. But apparently that is not true, the children of recent immigrants are assimilating quite well overall. Now, one important caveat is that the children of undocumented immigrants are not assimilating as well as those of legal immigrants. Why is that? Arguably, they are less likely to engage the broader society--public school and other basic avenues for social interaction, those structures that underlie the assimilation process, are more difficult for undocumented immigrants to access. So their isolation and difficulty becoming "Americans" is partly the result of being excluded from the process of Americanization by their legal standing.

3 comments:

Beck said...

Which isn't entirely surprising. Of course legal immigrants are going to be assimilating more easily into our society. Immigrants who legally settle here generally do so while following a path to citizenship that requires some level of proficiency in English, some knowledge of our culture, history, background, etc.

Illegal immigrants don't go through any such process. They only need to know how to cross the border without being detected, and who to contact for a job. Both are ludicrously easy to do right now.

This, combined with the problems you've cited in your post, make integration difficult at best, seeing as how you start your life here without anyway to communicate your needs, or build a rapport with those who already live here.

But then I have another question: How many of these illegal immigrants actually *want* to assimilate into American society? I was talking to a Latino friend of mine a few weeks ago, and he mentioned the fact that a good many (he said most, don't know if I buy that or not) of these folks are here simply to work and send money home, without any real aspirations of ever becoming an American citizen.

Which is an important point: What incentive is there to assimilate if you have no real desire to do so in the first place? If you're here illegally, you don't want to risk the inconvenience of getting caught and deported. It can take as long as two weeks to get back!

Yes, that's a bit of a jest... But there is a grain of truth there: in the Charlotte area, there are employers that expect a two week turnaround time for an illegal immigrant to be deported, and return to a job site. How fucking sad is that?

The problem with trying create a legal program to document these workers is that inevitably, issues will arise (paying taxes, minimum wages) that will undermine the benefits of hiring immigrants over American citizens, and we'll wind right back up at square one.

Beck said...

Oh, and to comment on the article at large (since I went off into the weeds a bit): Maybe I'm a bit of a rube, but I don't think I've ever heard anyone assert that today's immigrants (the legal ones, I mean) wuld be having a harder time assimilating than past generations. Maybe I live in a cave or something, but given the "smaller world" that we live in now, the ease of access to information around the globe, and our increasing awareness and appreciation of cultures and people outside our borders, I guess I assumed it was actually easier to integrate today than before? I dunno. I've worked and gone to school with so many people that have immigrated to this country, perhaps I take the issue for granted.

Anonymous said...

I am not so sure about the time line or objective issue. It is true that undocumented immigrants are often here for the shorter term compared to their documented counterparts. When I was teaching ESL that was certainly an issue. The Ukrainian students understood that they were US residents now and they need to get used to it, participate, and make an effort to integrate. Students whose parent's were here temporarily or for unknown durations were much more resistant to integration. I remember having a student that told me several times that they didn't need to do work because they were going back to Mexico next month anyway. Of course they didn't leave, but their parents always talked about returning so the kids were under less pressure to assimilate. This sort of limbo is really hard on kids.

That happens a lot, but I am not sure about how common this is. Many, many undocumented workers are here temporarily to do some work, make some money and return home. They are generally not likely to bring their kids though. Usually, men come alone, and after they spend a couple years living the stereotypical 6 guys to a room and sending half their check back home, they either head back or they bring their families up and settle down, legal or otherwise. It is far less common that they bring the whole fam and when they plan to stay for only a short time. So the experience changes the objective over time I think.