Showing posts with label Europe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Europe. Show all posts

Monday, February 18, 2008

Split EU meets to debate Kosovo

Some chanted "This is Serbia" while other carried banners appealing for help from Russia, which has opposed Kosovo's independence.

On Sunday, Kosovo's majority ethnic Albanians celebrated with fireworks late into the night after parliament's declaration.

In Brussels the chairman of the EU meeting, Slovenian Foreign Minister Dimitrij Rupel, said he understood "many of the member states will recognise" Kosovo.

His British and French colleagues insisted Kosovo was a unique case and called for EU unity on the issue, the BBC's Oana Lungescu reports.


I understand many EU members will recognise Kosovo
Dimitrij Rupel
Slovenian Foreign Minister

UK Foreign Secretary David Miliband described Kosovo as a "unique situation which deserves a unique response".

"I think it's very important that we recognise that all of the countries of the Western Balkans are European countries and therefore it's critical that Europe shows real leadership in how it ensures that peace and stability are the order of the day," he said.

But Spanish Foreign Minister Miguel Angel Moratinos said Spain would not recognise Sunday's declaration because it "does not respect international law".

German Chancellor Angela Merkel said her country, which has been predicted to back Kosovo independence, would not declare its position on Monday.

"The aim is to have a platform of unity within the EU, on which each member state can act," she said.

The EU has already agreed to send about 2,000 police, justice and civil administration officials to oversee Kosovo and help develop the province's institutions.

Russian opposition

A split emerged at the UN Security Council on Sunday when Russia said Kosovo's declaration should be null and void.


KOSOVO PROFILE
Population about two million
Majority ethnic Albanian; 10% Serb
Under UN control since Nato drove out Serb forces in 1999
2,000-strong EU staff to take over from UN after independence
Nato to stay to provide security

Russia's UN ambassador said there was no basis for changing a 1999 security council resolution on Kosovo's status - which hands Kosovo to the UN.

But seven Western states including the United States, the UK, Belgium and France issued a statement saying the situation had moved on.

Russia has indicated that Western recognition of an independent Kosovo could have implications for the breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia in Georgia.

China expressed its "deep concern" about Kosovo's declaration, urging it to reopen talks with Serbia.

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon called on all sides to keep to their commitments and refrain from violence.

A second emergency session is due to be held later on Monday. Unfortunately today Kosovo and Serbia are to become two dispensable chess-pieces of EU/NATO and Russia Mat, Ljubljana, Slovenia

The independence declaration said Kosovo would be built in accordance with the UN plan drawn up by former Finnish President Martti Ahtisaari.

The international military and civilian presence - also envisaged by the Ahtisaari plan - was welcome, Kosovo's Prime Minister Hashim Thaci said.

There should be no fear of discrimination in new Kosovo, he said, vowing to eradicate any such practices.

Violence

A hand grenade thrown at a UN court building in the flashpoint town of Mitrovica caused slight damage but otherwise there were no reports of trouble in Kosovo.

In Belgrade, clashes between gangs of youths and riot police went on into the early hours of Monday morning.

Demonstrators broke windows at the US embassy and also attacked the Serbian government building and the embassy of Slovenia which currently holds the EU presidency.

The Serbian government has called for a mass protest rally against the Kosovo declaration later in the week.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/europe/7249909.stm


Any thoughts on the new Kosovar independence? I am usually in favor of self-determination movements, and in general am all for Kosovo as an independent state. Still, the debate in the EU is interesting and brings up a lot of questions about when and for whom self-determination is fair and appropriate. And this is hard, because by what criteria is the right to self determination decided? These are major questions in the EU, especially since Spain, France, and a handful of other states have significant separatist movements. Is it inconsistent to say that Kosovo can be independent but the Basque region has to remain part of Spain or Corsica has to remain part of France? The problem is that it is really not possible to continually split nations into tinier and tinier entities; they are not economically or politically viable (at some point). If I have to put forth a general statement I would suggest that ethnic enclaves or minority regions should be given significant autonomy (as in Spain) if they exist in liberal democratic states where their rights are protected. If, on the other hand, they exist in an autocratic state where they face abuse or persecution then the international community should support their independence. I could go on and be more detailed, but this is getting long.

Saturday, December 8, 2007

Germany moves to ban Scientology

Germany's federal and state interior ministers have declared the Church of Scientology unconstitutional, clearing the way for a possible ban.

The ministers have asked Germany's domestic intelligence agency to examine whether the Church's legal status as an association could be challenged.

Scientology is not recognised as a religion in Germany.

A Church of Scientology statement said the ministers were "completely out of step with the rest of the world".

The attempted ban is "a blatant attempt at justifying the on-going and never-ending discrimination against the Church of Scientology and its members in Germany," said the Church in a statement.

Critics accuse the organisation of cult-type practices and exploiting followers for financial gain.

But Scientologists reject this and say that they promote a religion based on the understanding of the human spirit.

Cult-type practices

Since January, when the Church of Scientology opened a new centre in the German capital, Berlin, Scientologists have come under intense public scrutiny.

People living near the centre complained that its members were actively trying to recruit and some politicians called for the organisation to be banned, accusing it of cult-type practices.

For years, Scientology has been monitored by German intelligence agencies, who claim the movement's structures and methods could pose a threat to the rule of law and "democratic order".

But the Church of Scientology insists that 10 years of surveillance "has uncovered absolutely no wrongdoing".

Under the ministers' new plan, the intelligence services have been asked to draw up a report on Scientology, and ministers will then have to clarify whether there is a legal basis for a ban.

But the BBC's Tristana Moore in Berlin says given the lobbying power of Germany's 6,000 Scientologists, who say they have a right to freedom of religion, it will be difficult to introduce a ban.

Scientology was founded in the United States in the 1950s by science-fiction writer L Ron Hubbard.

In October, a Spanish court ruled that the Church of Scientology of Spain should be re-entered into the country's register of officially recognised religions.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/europe/7133867.stm

Normally I am ardently opposed to most types of restrictions on religion and free association and such. Ok, I am always opposed this kind of thing. But if there is one world "religion" to ban, this is the one to ban. I mean, come on, it's a religion started by the guy who wrote Battlefield Earth for Xenu's sake. I guess I am bound by principle to respect the rights of Scientologists just the way I respect the rights of other made up faiths...Wiccans, Mormons, etc. But at least those groups don't function like secret societies that only reveal their true practice to those who have been initiated into the inner circle of...oh wait, never mind.

Added by Pope on 1/25/08 - Article from Time, an insightful read:
http://www.xenu.net/archive/media/time910605.html

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Just a Sick Reality Show...or an Insightful Commentary?

A Dutch TV station says it will go ahead with a programme in which a terminally ill woman selects one of three patients to receive her kidneys.

Political parties have called for The Big Donor Show to be scrapped, but broadcaster BNN says it will highlight the country's shortage of organ donors.

"It's a crazy idea," said Joop Atsma, of the ruling Christian Democrat Party.

"It can't be possible that, in the Netherlands, people vote about who's getting a kidney," he told the BBC.

The programme, from Big Brother creators Endemol, is due to be screened on Friday night.

'Totally unacceptable'

The 37-year-old donor, identified only as Lisa, will make her choice based on the contestants' history, profile and conversation with their family and friends.

Viewers will also be able to send in their advice by text message during the 80-minute show.

When I first heard this story on the BBC this morning, I thought what a horrible, tasteless idea. Reality shows have gone too far (again). But, after listening to both sides in the debate, I wonder. The contestants have a 1 in 3 chance of getting a kidney on this show versus a 1 in 1000s on a donor list. Plus, if it and the debate surrounding it brings attention to the sad dearth of organ donors (a problem in the US as well), then maybe it will all be for the best. But still a little creepy no matter how you look it.

Oh, and they get around legal problems because in Holland a donor can choose the recipient so long as the donation is made while the donor is living. After a person dies the law stipulates it goes to the list.



Story excerpted from BBC NEWS. To read the story in its entirety, please visit:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/entertainment/6699847.stm