Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Turkey in radical revision of Islamic texts

By Robert Piggott
Religious affairs correspondent, BBC News

Turkey is preparing to publish a document that represents a revolutionary reinterpretation of Islam - and a controversial and radical modernisation of the religion.

The country's powerful Department of Religious Affairs has commissioned a team of theologians at Ankara University to carry out a fundamental revision of the Hadith, the second most sacred text in Islam after the Koran.

The Hadith is a collection of thousands of sayings reputed to come from the Prophet Muhammad.

As such, it is the principal guide for Muslims in interpreting the Koran and the source of the vast majority of Islamic law, or Sharia.


This is kind of akin to the Christian Reformation. Not exactly the same, but... it's changing the theological foundations of [the] religion
Fadi Hakura,
Turkey expert, Chatham House

But the Turkish state has come to see the Hadith as having an often negative influence on a society it is in a hurry to modernise, and believes it responsible for obscuring the original values of Islam.

It says that a significant number of the sayings were never uttered by Muhammad, and even some that were need now to be reinterpreted.

'Reformation'

Commentators say the very theology of Islam is being reinterpreted in order to effect a radical renewal of the religion.

Its supporters say the spirit of logic and reason inherent in Islam at its foundation 1,400 years ago are being rediscovered. Some believe it could represent the beginning of a reformation in the religion.


Some messages ban women from travelling without their husband's permission... But this isn't a religious ban. It came about because it simply wasn't safe for a woman to travel alone
Prof Mehmet Gormez,
Hadith expert,
Department of Religious Affairs

Turkish officials have been reticent about the revision of the Hadith until now, aware of the controversy it is likely to cause among traditionalist Muslims, but they have spoken to the BBC about the project, and their ambitious aims for it.

The forensic examination of the Hadiths has taken place in Ankara University's School of Theology.

An adviser to the project, Felix Koerner, says some of the sayings - also known individually as "hadiths" - can be shown to have been invented hundreds of years after the Prophet Muhammad died, to serve the purposes of contemporary society.

"Unfortunately you can even justify through alleged hadiths, the Muslim - or pseudo-Muslim - practice of female genital mutilation," he says.

"You can find messages which say 'that is what the Prophet ordered us to do'. But you can show historically how they came into being, as influences from other cultures, that were then projected onto Islamic tradition."

The argument is that Islamic tradition has been gradually hijacked by various - often conservative - cultures, seeking to use the religion for various forms of social control.

Leaders of the Hadith project say successive generations have embellished the text, attributing their political aims to the Prophet Muhammad himself.

Revolutionary

Turkey is intent on sweeping away that "cultural baggage" and returning to a form of Islam it claims accords with its original values and those of the Prophet.

But this is where the revolutionary nature of the work becomes apparent. Even some sayings accepted as being genuinely spoken by Muhammad have been altered and reinterpreted.

Prof Mehmet Gormez, a senior official in the Department of Religious Affairs and an expert on the Hadith, gives a telling example.

"There are some messages that ban women from travelling for three days or more without their husband's permission and they are genuine.

"But this isn't a religious ban. It came about because in the Prophet's time it simply wasn't safe for a woman to travel alone like that. But as time has passed, people have made permanent what was only supposed to be a temporary ban for safety reasons."

The project justifies such bold interference in the 1,400-year-old content of the Hadith by rigorous academic research.

Prof Gormez points out that in another speech, the Prophet said "he longed for the day when a woman might travel long distances alone".

So, he argues, it is clear what the Prophet's goal was.

Original spirit

Yet, until now, the ban has remained in the text, and helps to restrict the free movement of some Muslim women to this day.


There's also violence against women within families, including sexual harassment... This does not exist in Islam... we have to explain that to them
Hulya Koc, a "vaize"

As part of its aggressive programme of renewal, Turkey has given theological training to 450 women, and appointed them as senior imams called "vaizes".

They have been given the task of explaining the original spirit of Islam to remote communities in Turkey's vast interior.

One of the women, Hulya Koc, looked out over a sea of headscarves at a town meeting in central Turkey and told the women of the equality, justice and human rights guaranteed by an accurate interpretation of the Koran - one guided and confirmed by the revised Hadith.

She says that, at the moment, Islam is being widely used to justify the violent suppression of women.

"There are honour killings," she explains.

"We hear that some women are being killed when they marry the wrong person or run away with someone they love.

"There's also violence against women within families, including sexual harassment by uncles and others. This does not exist in Islam... we have to explain that to them."

'New Islam'

According to Fadi Hakura, an expert on Turkey from Chatham House in London, Turkey is doing nothing less than recreating Islam - changing it from a religion whose rules must be obeyed, to one designed to serve the needs of people in a modern secular democracy.

He says that to achieve it, the state is fashioning a new Islam.

"This is kind of akin to the Christian Reformation," he says.

"Not exactly the same, but if you think, it's changing the theological foundations of [the] religion. "

Fadi Hakura believes that until now secularist Turkey has been intent on creating a new politics for Islam.

Now, he says, "they are trying to fashion a new Islam."

Significantly, the "Ankara School" of theologians working on the new Hadith have been using Western critical techniques and philosophy.

They have also taken an even bolder step - rejecting a long-established rule of Muslim scholars that later (and often more conservative) texts override earlier ones.

"You have to see them as a whole," says Fadi Hakura.

"You can't say, for example, that the verses of violence override the verses of peace. This is used a lot in the Middle East, this kind of ideology.

"I cannot impress enough how fundamental [this change] is."

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/europe/7264903.stm

Interesting news regarding "revising" Islam. This is something to watch, I believe. There is a power struggle going on throughout Islam between hardline fundamentalists and reform-minded theologians and political/religious activists. It will truly be interesting to see how it pans out. I am particularly interested in this story as it focuses on the Hadith, which are often the most repressive "scriptures" and those used to justify maltreatment of women and jihad and such.

6 comments:

Beck said...

Wow...

On the one hand, I look forward to seeing what kind of impact the release of these revised texts will have on Islam around the world...

On the other hand, I am quite fearful of what kind of impact the release of these revised texts will have on Islam around the world... :P

Though my gut feeling is that it is largely a good thing. Strip away dogmatic flotsam and let the original, logical, and prudent elements of Islam re-emerge to the forefront.

Though I suspect those involved in the project should expect a fatwa to two calling for their deaths a day or two after the material's release...

Pope said...

This sounds great, but I remain skeptical. The Hadith is not only repressive to those who practice the religion, but it is downright vile against those who are not of the religion or even worse apostate. It is great that there are steps being taken to bring about equality in some small ways in the Islamic culture of Turkey, good for them. But I notice a blatant absence of any mention of the anti-non-Muslim passages. I would like to see how they reinterpret passages like this more moderate one:

“I have been ordered to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah and until they perform the prayers and pay the Zakah. Their doing so will earn them protection for their lives and property, unless [they do acts that are punishable] in accordance with Islam, and their reckoning will be with Allah the Almighty.”

Ugh... I will attempt to have some "faith" in this reinterpretation but ... well... we'll see.

Anonymous said...

I do wish we had a Muslim voice to chime in. I can make defenses all I like, but I am neither a religious scholar nor a practicing Muslim, so my knowledge is particularly limited. I see this as a relative good, not matter how far it goes. If it doesn't take hold, then I guess my limited faith in Islamic form was for little. If it does, then perhaps there will be some real Islamic reformation on par with Europe in the 1500s. We shall see. But I do regret we don;t have a "local" voice to add some depth to white secular debate.

Beck said...

Yeah, even my own scant few muslim friends are more secular than most, so I'm not sure their input would much different than ours.

Though in my own mind, even if this is the cornerstone upon which Reform Islam emerges, like the Reformation in Europe, it probably won't really change the face of Islam as we know it in our own lifetimes. So I doubt any of us will ever know for sure whether it will bring about real change or not.

Frayed One said...

Reinterpretation of religious texts is always a dangerous thing - no matter what the circumstances surrounding it and no matter what the religion being reinterpreted.

It's dangerous because no matter how you look at it - it is someone taking a pre-existing ideology and changing it into something else - something they have deemed somehow to be more true and less threatening to - well - them more than likely.

The problem is - whether you agree with the new version or the old one - you are taking someone, some person at their word and in the cases of most fanatical religions building your life around that. Human beings as a whole are fallible and thus I'm not sure that one persons interpretation is any better than the person before them. You just trade one set of evils for another.

Beck said...

Well, I agree and disagree.

I mean, look at Reform Judaism, for example. In a nutshell, it says "Ok, you know all those dogmatic practices and beliefs that actually have nothing to do with our moral and ethical obligations to each other? Like not eating pork or shellfish? Well, they're quaint and fun and all, but not terribly useful OR relevant to today's society... And really, the stories in our holy texts don't need to be literally factual to be true. What's important to being a good Jew is being a good person. Don't be afraid to integrate into the society in which you live, and strive to be a good neighbor.

Not a bad way to live, if you ask me, and not really any different than any secular system one could come up with. You just have a spiritual side that maintains an allegorical construct of God, and that loving yourself and others is loving God.

100% secularity would be boring, after all. :) I don't mind a little spiritual tilt so long as it doesn't have the albatross of dogmatic, morally irrelevant beliefs hanging around its neck.